<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Database Design</title>
	<link>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6</link>
	<description>Discussion of a web based desktop environment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link mmx.  I'll check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link mmx.  I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmx</title>
		<link>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>mmx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to see your finalized solution. 

Using a normalized table approach usually results in one additional table to handle one-to-many relationships (i.e. a user being a member of multiple groups), but the approach is extensible in the future if someone needs a finer-grained authorization solution. Case in point, the following link shows a fine-grained RBAC solution based on the use of normalized tables while following NIST guidelines. You can see how the approach could be applied to your original design to add fine-grained authorization all the way down to a module's content item level. 

http://www.sqlrecipes.com/database_design/fine_grained_role_based_access_control_rbac_system-3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to see your finalized solution. </p>
<p>Using a normalized table approach usually results in one additional table to handle one-to-many relationships (i.e. a user being a member of multiple groups), but the approach is extensible in the future if someone needs a finer-grained authorization solution. Case in point, the following link shows a fine-grained RBAC solution based on the use of normalized tables while following NIST guidelines. You can see how the approach could be applied to your original design to add fine-grained authorization all the way down to a module&#8217;s content item level. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sqlrecipes.com/database_design/fine_grained_role_based_access_control_rbac_system-3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqlrecipes.com/database_design/fine_grained_role_based_access_control_rbac_system-3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franckxx</title>
		<link>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Franckxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://qwikioffice.com/blog/?p=6#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Really interesting, pressed to see next release !! héhé !

Cool to reduce nombers of table... for easy implementation in existing apps/

thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting, pressed to see next release !! héhé !</p>
<p>Cool to reduce nombers of table&#8230; for easy implementation in existing apps/</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
